Highway code for cyclists

6/4/2017

Bicycles should be fitted with front and rear lights to make cyclists more visible in the dark.

According to the THINK! Cycling Campaign, the number of cyclists seriously injured has increased in recent years, faster than the increase in cyclists on the roads. If you are planning to start cycling on the road, it is important to make sure you have a full understanding of the Highway Code and know how to keep yourself safe. Below we have outlined some of the key rules from the Highway Code for cyclists to follow.

Section 59
Section 59 of the Highway Code explains the appropriate clothing cyclists should wear in order to make it easier for other road users to spot them and help to keep them protected in the case of a collision.

Cyclist clothing:

Helmet – Your cycle helmet should conform to the current regulations, be the correct size for your head and be securely fastened.
Appropriate fitted clothing – Your clothing should be tight fitted to prevent it getting tangled in the chain or wheel of your bicycle.
Light clothing – Light and fluorescent clothing will help you to stand out in daylight and poor light.
Reflective accessories – Strips on the helmet, as well as armbands and ankle bands will help you be seen in the dark.

Section 60
This section of the Highway Code is all about cyclists’ lights and reflectors. At night cyclists must have their white front and red rear lights lit. Their bicycles must also be fitted with a red rear reflector and amber pedal reflectors. White front reflectors and spoke reflectors can also increase your visibility to other road users. Flashing lights are permitted but cyclists riding in areas without street lighting should use a steady front lamp instead.

Cyclists should use dedicated cycle lanes and routes wherever possible.

Section 61
Section 61 covers cycle routes and other facilities for cyclists. If cycle routes are available cyclists should make use of them, as they can make their journeys safer. Cyclists should also use advanced stop lines, cycle boxes and toucan crossings, unless it is unsafe to do so.

Section 62
Section 62 covers the use of cycle tracks, which can be used to make a journey safer. Cycle tracks are usually located away from the road, but are sometimes found alongside footpaths and pavements. Sometimes cycle tracks will have a separate path for pedestrians, however this is not always the case.

If you are using a segregated path, it is important to make sure you stay on the right side of the track to avoid colliding with pedestrians. Be on high alert in case pedestrians pass into your lane without realising.

If you are sharing a path, take extra care and give plenty of room to children, the elderly and disabled people. You should always be riding at a speed that would allow you to slow down and stop if necessary.

Section 63
Cycle lanes are marked by a white line (which may be broken) and are found alongside the carriageway. Although not compulsory, you should use the lanes whenever practical as they can make your journey safer. If you need to leave the cycle lane, always check that it is safe to do so and signal to other road users.

Section 64
Something that confuses many cyclists is whether or not they are allowed to cycle on the pavement. According to Laws HA 1835 section 72 & RSA 1984, section 129, cyclists must not cycle on the pavement.

Section 65
Cyclists can use bus lanes when permitted to by road signs. Take extra care and watch out for people getting on or off buses. Only overtake a bus pulling into a bus lane if it is safe to do so. Do not pass between the kerb and a bus when it is at a stop.

Section 66
This section explains what cyclists should and should not do when riding on the road.

You should:

Keep both hands on the handlebars except when signalling or changing gear.
Keep both feet on the pedals.
Be considerate of other road users, taking extra care around blind and partially sighted pedestrians. Use your bell when necessary to signal you are nearby.
Ride single file on narrow or busy roads and when riding round bends

You should not:

Ride more than two abreast.
Ride close behind another vehicle.
Carry anything that will affect your balance or get tangled up in your wheels or chain.

Section 67
Follow the steps below to promote safety on the roads:

Look all around to ensure it is safe to move away from the kerb, turn corners or manoeuvre your bicycle.
Always use a clear signal to indicate your intentions to other road users.
Keep an eye out for obstructions in the road to prevent you from having to swerve to avoid them.
Leave plenty of room when passing parked vehicles and watch out for pedestrians stepping into your path.
Be aware of traffic coming up behind you.
Take extra care near road humps, narrowings and other traffic calming features.
Take care when overtaking other road users.

Section 68
Cyclists should not carry a passenger on their bicycle, unless it has been build to carry one. They must not ride in a dangerous, careless or inconsiderate manner. Cyclists must not ride under the influence of alcohol or drugs (including some medications).

Section 69
Traffic signs and traffic light signals apply to all road users. Cyclists must obey them.

Section 70
Just as there are parking rules for vehicles, there are also ones for cyclists. You should always aim to use cycle stands of cycle parking facilities wherever possible and avoid leaving your bike where it would cause an obstruction or hazard to others.

Section 71
A red traffic light applies to all road users. Cyclists must not cross the stop line if the traffic lights are red. Use the separate stop line for cyclists when practical.

We hope this article has helped you gain a better understanding of the Highway Code for cyclists and given you more confidence in riding safely on the road. If you have any questions feel free to get in touch.

Image source: Richard Masoner and samsaundersleeds

155 Comments

David Proctor

1/2/2016 17:04:29

Why are cyclists no longer required to have a bell to warn of their presence?

Sadie??????

22/9/2017 20:59:06

Love help

4/10/2017 23:30:59

I think the reason bicycles are no longer required to have a bell is because most modern humans are fitted with a "gob" or sounding device which can be used to warn others of their presence.
As the vast majority of cyclists are human the bell was deemed no longer necessary.

Bob.C

10/12/2018 09:49:19

The problem is not that cyclists have a gob but that they are distracted by many things some being on the phone or listening to other devises. As such their attention is not 100% on the road / pavement and they don't realise that they may cause a danger to other road users ie pedestrians. A bell and the law with legislation should be in force and persons cycling without reasonable consideration or due care and attention or dangerously should be brought to book.

Judy

1/7/2020 11:39:33

Shame most don't use it!

Lu link

9/7/2020 20:06:10

Gob?as in mouth😂

Christopher Johns

24/7/2020 09:50:18

Who 'deemed that the bell was no longer necessary' but deemed that no cycle can be legally sold without a bell?

Ken Grade link

25/8/2020 16:29:19

In heavy or noisy traffic being equipped with a "gob" isn't always sufficient! Yes, it is the legal minimum for "audible warning of approach" but not always loud enough.

Paul link

9/10/2020 16:22:46

The problem it when we do use the bell walkers ignore us. I have it all the time I ride 4 mile to work. Always ppl with dogs on extended leads moan when we pass. Moan when we use Bell. Moan when we as can we pass please. And moan when they are on the cycling side of the shared path. No matter what we do you ppl will moan

megan link

17/11/2017 18:18:22

becacse they are spoupied.

David

29/9/2019 11:46:42

Just like car driver's not paying attention yell out of their window and blast their horn highway code says only use your horn if another car doesn't see you why don't car drivers get fined for misuse of horn

aDub

29/9/2019 12:01:32

Police at 3am, at full chat with lights ^ sirens going on a road section without junctions and no traffic! WHY?
"We're awake and having fun, why aren't you?"

John Corrigan

31/12/2017 19:47:03

A bicycle cannot be sold without a bell under fairly modern legislation however, there is nothing in the legislation requiring it to remain on the bike and, in many instances it is never fitted. Also, most serious cyclists don't buy complete bikes, they specify what they require and usually fit pedals themselves, so they have not bought a complete bike. The law requires consideration for other road users and I believe that my voice allows me to give good and clear indication of my presence. It is going to be interesting to listen to the 'bell' arguments applied to, virtually silent, electric cars!

Graham Cullimore

15/6/2018 09:51:42

I totally fail to see your point about 'virtually silent electric cars'. Cycles are virtually silent too - but cars are required to have a horn if a warning is needed, something you seem to be overlooking. Why would there ever be a 'bell' argument about electric cars when they already have a superior device intended for the same purpose?

29/9/2019 12:21:34

Near silent electric cars? I've had near silent petrol cars, so not a new issue! As said, bikes are pretty quiet. I use my bell a lot when approaching pedestrians and other cyclists. I often wonder why people don't react. Then see that they are *walking on the wrong side of the road *wearing head headphones *looking at a phone.
And yet they will be the first to whine if they get hit. Never their fault! The gene pool seems to be drying out.
For car drivers I roar! "Oi!" They hear me! And the reciprocated abuse is directly proportional to their guilt!
Why must they abuse when they are in the wrong? A simple wave and a mouthed "sorry mate!" would go a long way, and they'd probably be more likely to learn from their mistake.

Christopher Johns link

7/12/2019 11:22:20

Oh no! Who decided that electric cars do not need a horn?

Irene mckay

13/5/2020 16:52:11

I am registered blind with only 5% vision in one eye I use a long white cane I use a cycle/pedestrian path by the river where I live I am so annoyed that none of the many many cyclists don’t use a bell or shout out when approaching me when walking I try to stay as near the edge on the left side of the path but they fly by at great speed which is pretty frightening I do think bells should be compulsory I don’t use any music devices which I would love to do so that I can try to listen for the bikes but they whizzing by so fast

Andrew Sommerville

21/4/2021 14:09:52

John,
I appreciate your point about your voice but I believe that you are mistaken. I regularly run on narrow country lanes and I am frequently unpleasantly surprised by cyclists approaching silently from behind. On the VERY rare occasions that they give a warning, it is only ever a shout as to which side they will be overtaking from. The problem is that it takes a noticeable amount of time to process a gruff message appearing out of nowhere and can sometimes be quite a shock A tinkle from a cycle bell, however, is instantaneously recognisable and dosen't have the same shock effect.

Angela

8/9/2021 23:19:04

Section 66 as mentioned about states you should use your bell to inform others of your presence. It doesn't say "If you have one, us your bell". It assumes you have one, therefore it should be used.

Owen Lawson

14/1/2018 22:50:05

Because is a driver going to hear a bell no. And nower days nethier to pedestrians.

29/9/2019 11:48:06

Here here well put

Steve Burnell

19/1/2018 14:01:03

I don't think they ever were required to have a bell. The cyclist had to have (and it may still be) 'an audible means of warning'. Warning could or can be made by voice. A new bicycle offered for sale has to have a bell fitted, but that law isn't part of the Highway Code.

29/9/2019 11:49:22

It is also highway code says only use your horn when needed

Ian Poskitt

1/5/2018 20:46:11

Is this true? I think cyclist should have a bell, those who object to the insignificant weight of a bell just aren't thinking straight. A bell can forewarn pedestrians of your approach and it uniquely identifies you as cyclist.

29/9/2019 11:51:38

Who are these people on here bicycle have to have a bell not that people would not here them cause they are always on their phone

Stephen Holroyd

7/3/2019 14:03:04

All new cycles must be fitted with a bell before sale. recent law.

7/12/2019 11:32:35

About time too. And now there should be introduced a new law whoch says that no bicycle shall be used where others may be present (eg. road, cycle track, bridle path (footpath!) without the bell being in place and in working condition, capable from a simple flick of generating a ring of a certain, audible-to-a-person-not-wearing-headphones number of decibels,
And I think there should also be another new law outlawing the use of headphones when crossing the road or walking along a public pavement./footpath. And limiting the noise generated by a car radio/CD player to a level where outside noises can also be heard. And prohibiting the use of a car radio etc. when a window is open when there are people/vehicles within 15 metres. .

Mike link

26/6/2019 17:04:39

section 66 states one should be ready to use a bell

Anthony McNally

17/9/2020 16:01:40

Rarely does one ring the bell or toot the horn in a real scenerio where it's required.people step out unexpectedly and we express our feelings using them.when people are considerate there is no need for warning.i agree about a wave and apology.even if ingenious.
I was knocked off my bike by an 'apex preditor'(driver who uses the corner of the car to the curb rule from their lessons.)however they seem to forget the corner on a left hand bend brings the car closer at the apex.the driver looked directly at me and gave me the finger as she pulled away.
Some drivers vere purposely into the curb at traffic lights to stop cycles getting past.i shouted at the top of my voice as she closed the gap.this may have caused her to look left and naturally vere too.my shout or similar means of notification may have been the final nail.she may have started moving out at the same moment.

R.Craven

27/6/2019 15:31:53

Because they never have been require by law ti have a bell or other warning dec vise at all.

29/9/2019 11:43:25

They are why do people walk in bike lanes rather than their lane

19/4/2020 11:38:20

David: assuming your hieroglyphics were a question - why do cyclists cycle on the pavement rather than 'their lane' (the road)?
I suggest people walk in bicycle lanes because they have in the pasty always walked on that - when it was a 'pavement' and all bicycles had to ride IN THE ROAD.

Grandad

12/7/2020 13:17:57

section 66 of highway code use your bell when necessay to warn people of your presence.

Bob Cunliffe

17/9/2020 16:20:29

Yes , Section 66 of the Highway Code needs to be deleted.
A bell can be a convenience, but when you need to warn pedestrians, then it's dangerous.
We've only got 2 thumbs.
This means that
we can either apply both brakes,
or
apply one brake and ring the bell.

When there's a need to alert another road users, then the best thing is to;
- apply both brakes
- shout a warning

Bob Cunliffe link

9/8/2020 21:55:16

We've only got 2 thumbs.
This means that
we can either apply both brakes,
or
apply one brake and ring the bell.

When there's a need to alert another road users, then the best thing is to;
- apply both brakes
- shout a warning

17/9/2020 16:03:34

100% agree.

John

12/10/2020 20:39:26

If you're on a cycle path and going so fast you can only ring a bell or use your brakes then it sounds like you are going too fast for that stretch of the cycle path. If you can't see the pedestrians (sharp corner or whatever) then you should be slowing down well in advance of the corner ... there might be some idiot coming towards you from the other direction going so fast they can only ring a bell or brake.

This holds true for anyone travelling on a path where you can't see clearly. If a jogger runs around a blind corner and collides with anyone (or anything) then they weren't applying basic self-preservation. If a pedestrian walks into a lamppost because they were on the phone then the same applies.

Speed is irrelevant when lack of awareness of your surroundings reigns.

Kevin Green

25/9/2020 23:35:52

They never have been required to have a bell.....it is only and advisory!

Angela Dyson

17/9/2021 18:36:39

Section 66 of the highway code requires cyclists to use their bell when necessary, automatically assuming that your bike will have a bell which implies cyclists are required to have one.

Myk

20/3/2022 18:53:31

Wrong, it says "should" use a bell. Anything in the high way code that says should is only advice, if it said must than it means it's backed up by law but it doesn't so it is only advice that a cyclists has and uses a bell

HND Assignments link

2/3/2022 06:17:37

Your blogs are always interesting. Thank you for sharing helpful content with us.

William

21/8/2016 06:38:15

"Cyclists should use dedicated cycle lanes and routes wherever possible." - Cycle lane use is not compulsory and the choice as to whether or not to use them is down to the cyclist. Saying they "should" use said facilities "wherever possible" sends out the wrong message as many facilities are badly designed and poorly maintained. There have been many instances whereby cyclists have been injured by riding in cycle lanes, by things like car doors swinging open. In many cases you are simply better off OUT of the lane. If other people don't respect your legal rights then that's their problem to rectify, not yours.

15/11/2016 13:32:06

"should" means it's a recommendation, "must/must not" would refer to a legal requirement.
However many anti-cyclist commenters seem to take that wording as meaning mandatory.

I agree a lot of cycle lanes are poorly designed, examples on my commute include running parallel to on street car parking, running on the footpath between driveways and an A road where there's no visibility for people exiting their drives.

I've had people shout at me to get in the cycle lane in some cases when it's not even a cycle lane but shared use path ...

Paul

21/9/2017 02:11:19

The same can be said for bus lanes. Sticking strictly to the law you need to make a sharp left hand turn across the bus lane to enter the local college. Would be better to terminate the bus lane like is done a junctions a few meters before the college entrance.

29/9/2019 11:54:56

Drivers should also look in mirrors and ahead they fiddle with to many sound and phone equipment nowadays

Eric Drummond link

16/5/2017 00:37:03

More to the point: these Lithuanians have just made that bit up - it's not even in the real Highway Code!
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q="Cyclists+should+use+dedicated+cycle+lanes+and+routes+wherever+possible"+site%3Agov.uk
"No results found for "Cyclists should use dedicated cycle lanes and routes wherever possible" site:gov.uk"
Highway Code says
"Use of these facilities is not compulsory and will depend on your experience and skills, but they can make your journey safer."

Pete

1/9/2017 17:41:17

I gather you're too macho to use a cycle lane

Amedeo Felix

5/2/2018 10:07:32

Nothing to do with bravado. It cannot be assumed that the painted stripe making the lane is necessarily the best place to be. I can think of many reasons to be outside it: the surface of many roads close to the kerbs are especially damaged and so a hazard, there could be parked vehicles ahead and leaving the lane well before getting to them is best practice...

29/9/2019 12:51:29

You don't cycle do you Pete? Cycle lanes occupy the part of the road were you wouldn't want to drive your car. Potholes, bits of car, glass, puddles, drains, gratings, uneven surfaces, fast food packaging dumped by car drivers, parked cars, even on the solid stripe, moving cars, brambles, bits of tree, I could go on!

I always signal if moving out of the cycle lane, especially where they stop at road narrowing etc.

I would imagine that most cycle paths are laid out by non-cyclists looking at a map. I rate them as dangerous and inconvenient with constant stopping and starting, along with pedestrians (and cyclists) who don't know which part to use.

Both have instructions/signage that can only be acted upon at walking pace! In short, they are not built for cyclists.

While I'm here ***OTHER CYCLISTS*** be polite! It takes nothing to thank a car driver for being patient. I was on holiday in Wales this week driving past (and toward) lots of bikes, not one offered any recognition of my courtesy to them, yet when I was cycling around Anglesey, I was constantly giving thumbs up and waiving the cautious past. PLAY THE GAME GUYS! Like me you are probably concentrating on cadence and obstacles, but it looks arrogant!

5/2/2018 10:04:11

I do not know where this rubbish comes from but it is NOT official wording, this is from the .gov site:

Rule 61

Cycle Routes and Other Facilities. Use cycle routes, advanced stop lines, cycle boxes and toucan crossings unless at the time it is unsafe to do so. Use of these facilities is not compulsory and will depend on your experience and skills, but they can make your journey safer.

Chris

12/8/2020 13:38:55

Oh how I agree!
I frequently don't ride in the cycle lane, as they are frequently full of uncleared rubbish, ejected by motorists.
One unlucky motorist was caught on my helmet cam throwing cans and all sorts out of his passenger side window. At the traffic lights, I told him he would be reported. At that he got out to remonstrate, or worse. A motorcyclist behind me lofted his foot at the motorist as he overtook the stationery traffic. Let's just say that the offending motorist was kicked where it hurts. And he was prosecuted for littering and given Community Service to do.
What I loved was the instant Karma!

Andrew

11/10/2020 17:28:31

Cycle lanes in my area take up half the pavement. Cyclists should be aware that a cycle lane is not a right of way but advisory..in that if I am trying to socially distance myself from oncoming pedestrians by first checking and using the cycle land briefly.. an more distant but oncoming cyclist should respect that and slow down briefly to allow this 10s event... 5 times in lockdown high speed cyclists have refused to slow down and sworn at me in the unpleasant aggressive manner that many cyclists adopt ....

6/4/2022 08:18:27

Your blogs are always interesting. Thank you for sharing helpful content with us. Its Amazing

spoonface link

24/1/2021 21:25:47

I ride and have ridden more miles than all of you and seen all tossers on cycles going through red lights & being knocked off doing so!! No I'm not a office worker Sunday black lycia wearing tosspot ither!! I cycle 110miles a week and totally ashamed to say most cycles are tosspots wearing BLACK No lights (day & night) cycling on pavements Going through Red lights double abreast in restricted areas!!! I've been doing this for 35 years day & night & seen it all!! Be ashamed of yourself and engage the brain bla bla bla. Yes I've camara footage of incompetent car & cycle but please make me proud of being a cyclists!!!

Ricky J Klapper

5/8/2021 15:15:09

W
It's illegal to ride on blacktop on highways so why don't they arrest any bike not riding on gravel also their a. Common sense .pettle a exercise bike. Stay off highway blacktop . it's the law .report all . doesn't everyone

F FAROZ

11/12/2016 19:48:38

what organisation in the UK does one complain to regarding a UK-based delivery company which employs paddle cyclists on British roads as workers who do not know and have not received cycling training about cycling SAFELY on British roads ?

joyce cattanach

10/6/2018 00:47:55

You report them to the Police, if they are breaking the LAW. Contravening the road traffic act.

27/6/2021 12:19:54

If they’re “gig economy”, they’re in limbo in regard to employment status, they’re self employed contractors, but have some employee rights.
As with so many things these days, the continuing development of circumstances outstrips legislation before the laws are passed

Muhammad Shahbaz link

5/6/2017 10:48:56

Dear Sir/Madam,
We are manufacturer and exporter of all sorts of cycling wears, we are producing complete range of cycling clothing’s, the products will be provided to you as per your needs and requirement.
If you need any product please let me know and I’ll produce them for you, I have attached above some products photos for your consideration.
If you are interested please contact for more details.
Look forward to hearing from you,
With much respect and best regards,
Muhammad Shahbaz
Sanwin Enterprises
www.sanwin.pk
info@sanwin.pk
Mobile & Whatsapp: - 0092-300-9610525

R Craven

7/3/2019 15:53:09

NIce advert for your business muhammad

Martyn Edney

8/6/2017 10:18:49

Is there any guidance if you are in a cycle lane, parrallel to the road lane for cars and the cars are stacked up in a queue. The cycle lane is often still free but I feel like I am undertaking. Cars also undertake other cars and use the cycle lane to do so, often putting me at risk as they do not check their side mirrors before moving.

21/9/2017 02:14:27

Legally a bike can overtake by the left (the legal definition) or undertake as you put it irrespective of the speed of the traffic. As for cars etc, should the traffic flow be below 10mph they can do the same.

7/3/2019 15:57:59

Incorrect Paul any vehicle can overtaken/undertake another if there are two distinct lanes or lines of traffic going in the same direction and the outside one is going slower than the inside one the inside one can undertake and visa versa. Relative speeds of vehicles don't come into it.

Matthew Burns

16/9/2019 12:13:47

Common sense is always necessary.
I'd by default rather wait and make sure before I attempt to pass on the left. And often I will wait.

John in Cambridge

25/8/2017 12:06:17

Incorrect page numbering on contents of downloaded version. Cyclists section does not start on page 22 but on page 28 (page 29 of pdf).

9/9/2017 15:29:24

Clearly the local cycle clubs in my area haven't read the Highway Code or done any sort of proficiency test. They ALL ride 2-3 abreast on busy roads sometimes blocking roads for miles. They ride on pavements when they shouldn't. They don't ride on cycle paths when they should. I can fully understand why some drivers get rather frustrated. I had a 6 mile slowdown recently as a group of 20 cyclists on country roads stopped all cars from getting past them, the queue was 20 deep and I'm surprised the front car didn't nudge the back bikes wheels

21/9/2017 02:17:30

It is an offence for any vehicle to obstruct the flow of traffic on the public highway. It is a prime example of how selfish people have become. Only 2 abreast is permitted and only when not causing an obsctruction

Steve

22/9/2017 15:30:08

Paul, can you provide a reference to the part of the code you're referring to (i.e. going too slow)? I've only heard of the police stopping cars on motorways for going too slow - even then I don't think it's an offence.

Bob.C.

1/12/2018 09:16:23

The offence with any motor vehicle would be driving without reasonable consideration. S.3 RTA 1960 as amm. When travelling too slow and holding up traffic. Farmers on tractors that cannot travel as fast as others and that are slowing traffic down would commit the offence if there is a queue of traffic being held up. In those circumstances the driver should always be aware of what he is doing or is likely to do and should from time to time and where safe and applicable pull in to allow that traffic to pass. The same would happen to a cyclist if not being reasonable by purposely or otherwise holding traffic up and not allowing them safe passage on the Highway.

Julia

24/1/2018 09:42:47

nudging the back wheel of a cyclist is an incredibly dangerous and aggressive thing to. The cyclists' behaviour might have been frustrating for the motorists but motorists have to deal with driving frustrations all the time

5/2/2018 10:09:31

The 'should' is NOT from the highway code. In the real code (I posted it above) is clearly states a cyclists does not have to use a cycle lane.

iain bunniss

17/2/2018 14:49:37

the only problem I have is cycists using footpaths and going though red lights as a car driver and perdestrian its damed annoying

Tim

23/2/2018 11:33:18

the only problem I have are cars parking on footpaths and going though red lights, as a cyclist and pedestrian its damned annoying! I like spelling as well!

Marcus

25/8/2019 10:32:27

As far as the current law stands in England , pedestrians have complete right of way on footpaths. A cyclist can only be on a footpath if they have the Landowners permission! Otherwise they are trespassing!

29/9/2019 11:58:03

Same when car drives jump red lights and use cycle lanes

Francis

3/5/2020 16:41:03

You are on rather weak ground when it comes to pointing out that motorists do so, but, hey so do you, more so in fact.

Fed up pedestrian

26/4/2018 00:42:41

Since the lycra clad lunatics use the pedestrian footpaths with total impunity is there any law stopping pedestrians from wandering along a bicycle lane?

29/9/2019 12:00:32

Same as a cycles fed up with people using bike lanes when there's a path for them

John Millard

14/5/2018 16:10:51

Is two way cycling on a one way street allowed.I know it is not recommended but is it legal. The police could not tell me or tthe county council

10/6/2018 00:44:34

A bicycle is a road vehicle, therefore is subject to every traffic regulation which includes one way streets.
Cyclists MUST follow the flow of traffic and not go the wrong way along any one way street.

15/6/2018 10:22:52

Cyclise MUST obay ALL road signs and road markings, same as any other vehicle. One way streets usually have a sign stating such!

Kelly

10/12/2018 03:38:13

A pedal cycle is a "motor vehicle" on the road within the meaning of the Road Traffic Act 1972.
A cyclist MUST obey all road signs.
One way flow is compulsory (emergency vehicles police etc comply with exclusion provisions).
Answer is inherent in the Road Traffic Act

Bob C.

7/3/2019 16:06:14

Sorry but generally a cycle is not a motor vehicle in RTA legislation. iI is considered to be a carriage ie like a horse and carriage or other conveyance for the carriage of a person or persons

As such it and the cyclists are not necessarily bound by RTA laws unless stipulated in that legislation. There is other legislation that specifically covers some issues.

29/9/2019 12:03:54

It isn't because they have no moter in them a bicycle can't do 60 mph or more driver's should obey speed limits even police aren't bothered so much now

Justine link

23/7/2020 14:19:33

Thanks that helped

7/12/2019 11:49:19

John, Many Thanks for your posting. I find it incredible, but at the same time the only logical explanation of the apparent attitude of the Police to cyclists (Don't apprehend them for crossing traffic lights at red, Don't apprehend them for cycling on the pavement) that the Police are indeed not even aware of The Law with respect to cyclists. How can we bring them up to speed? Offer them courses on 'The Law with respect to Cyclists' at £100 a throw?

Gordon McKay

29/7/2018 12:46:27

Can people cycle on dual carriage A roads?

Martin Staines

12/8/2018 18:48:10

Yes cyclist can use all roads except motorways or where a sign states no cycles (a very few horrendously busy big roads)

1/12/2018 09:34:49

It says that one should stop on the red light but the law and regs. do say that one must stop on the AMBER light also. Many drivers and cyclists don't do that but speed up to the green light even though that increases the chance of it changing to AMBER and RED. It appears that they don't want to be held up for a minute or two and are prepared to commit an endorsable moving traffic offence but also and more importantly commit to something that could endanger themselves or others. The AMBER light is on for 3 seconds and should only be passd if too close and cannot stop in time...that doesn't mean running through it at speed in order to beat it. That creates more tailgating and more danger and that ends badly in rear end shunts . damage to at least two vehicle and possible injuries, some that can have serious consequences.. Drive with care and consideration all the time should be a reminder in the H.C.

10/12/2018 03:42:04

Some A Roads are beginning to prohibit cyclists.

Problems arise because there is no one set rule.
Can ride on some pavements not on others, adds to confusion.

16/9/2019 12:23:15

Generally A roads that have been deemed to have become too dangerous for cyclists have been turned into motorways.
So on a map it would look like A54(M).
But common sense is key really.
Round my way, one road I'd never cycle on in the week (probably on Xmas Day as a 'treat' lol!) is the A5 around Cannock West Mids even though technically I am not prohibited from doing so.

1/12/2018 09:24:11

If the law and there are two of them say that riding on the pavement is unlawful then why are they facilitated to do so. It appears that they are allowed to ride on any and all pavements where there is no provision made for them at all. Who makes that provision or makes the allowances allowing unlawful usage and what legislation makes them lawfull.

Lucy

6/12/2018 06:56:46

Any speedy rider would not be bothered to use pavement. There is no need to worry worry about considering rider even young child who rides as fast as walk

Bob C

6/12/2018 08:51:17

I have no problem with children under 11 years of age riding on the pavements as that to me would be safer than allowing them on the roads, providing that they don't create a danger. What I am subjected to every day where I live is male adult cyclist cycling past me from behind at what can only be described by Jane as excessive speed. As I am at walking pace and they are doing more than 10 mph.or more. The swerve past without any pre warnings, not heard. Many of them, as on the roadway are using hand held devices, on phones and i pods etc. I know of some elderly person who have been run into by them and they just rider of as they have no lawful responsibility.

They and their conduct need to be brought to account. In the past cyclists were effectively barred by legislation and now they have Court Blanch to do whatever they want. Politicians both in Government and local authorities are bending over backwards to assist them in any way that they can., They have had some £1 Billion spent on cycling initiatives in the last 10 years and at this time of austerity.

ole

30/4/2019 10:20:02

Riding in excess of 200 miles a week, I can attest it is actually quite the opposite. It is mainly pedestrians, especially dog walkers who don't give a flying f...ck about anything but themselves. They think they own the space even if it is a shared footpath/cycle lane. Oftentimes walking with headphones on, while staring at a smartphone, completely oblivious to their surrounding. Walking onto the carriageway or cycle lane without even checking if a car or bike is approaching. Sometimes they say "sorry" with a moronic face on (to which I reply "you will be one day", or look at me as if I was the one doing something wrong. I get 2-3 mongs like that over a 20 mile long commute. How is having a bell fitted and ringing it supposed to warn them of my presence is beyond my understanding.
By the way, it is carte blanche.

Jen

9/5/2019 03:26:15

This is so true. I had a miserable old lady grumble at me today on a shared path. My bike is a small fold up and pulls a bike buggy with my toddler in it. The road is busy as anything and the main this is the damn pavement is a shared one.
I’m new to cycling as a car alternative after giving up my car last month to change my lifestyle.
I actually feel really angry at the state of bike paths and the attitudes of pedestrians who are glued to their phones or just stupid.
If anyone thinks I should be on a busy road with as low bike buggy with a bike with limited gears then they deserve a huge slap. I’m very considerate to pedestrians and car when I cross.
The country needs gearing up to bikes as there are too many cars and the environment is fluffed up!
I was and probably still plan to but a better cargo bike for my son however right now after today I’m in a really bad mood and want to say sod it, I’ll not sell my car, and not give a damn about the world. Spit my dummy out!
In regards to children’s ages I had my 14 year old son who is autistic, dyspraxic and blind in one eye. Over my dead body will he be forced into a position where he’s not safe. And it’s not bloody safe on the roads I’m not risking it. If anyone says he shouldn’t then ride then we have far more issues in society than I thought.
The police are at their discretion as if it isn’t safe for road cycling especially with children, then they are advised not to enforce it. I hate cycle paths integrated on the road as cars and busses just enter them and the amount of paths that stop abruptly are ridiculous.
The amount of pedestrians bar the centre of a town a serious minimal. Most people drive a car everywhere. The likelihood of an injury is tiny especially when decent cyclists are respectful and considerate of everyone around.

terry

7/5/2019 16:11:52

Wot a load of twoddle.
My personal gripe is the person who presses the crossing button on a pedestrian crossing when I am the only car in sight.
Whatever happened to 'common sense'

jenny talwarts

5/6/2019 22:41:32

The Highway Code's not clear enough about Dual Use Zebra Crossings where there are seperate areas for pedestrians and bikes ( as opposed to Toucan crossings that have traffic lights ). They are a recent phenomena and are becoming more widespread. If it's not in the Highway code how are motorists and cyclists to know who has priority ?

The highway code says that cyclists should not ride across zebra crossings but is this also true of dual use zebra crossings ?

Should cars stop if a cyclist has already gone onto the crossing ? Or are bikes expected to wait for a gap in traffic?

Ian

16/7/2019 20:21:53

I live in halifax west yorkshire and regulary use the a646 to visit an elderly relative. People who ride bikes is say this as they wear lycra and once on the road the do not indicate when they pull out nor look behind also ride two and three abrest on a very busy single lane at upwards to 40 mph to emulate the tour de yorkshire on several occasions i have had to brake these people spoil it for proper cyclists who do use the high way code, god forbid a accident as the car driver is always in the wrong .on one occasion i beeped to make my presence known further down the road at lights the cyclist caught me up and put up two fingers very very sad.all these people if they are in training should know the importance of the highway code.

Jason

31/12/2019 05:06:29

Lucky you only got two fingers , do car drivers not realise just how dangerous and reckless it is to come up behind a bike and bib there horn
You should try it sometime from a cyclists point of view especially when it’s dark too 🤣
Jason

19/4/2020 11:55:30

Sorry, Jason. Are you really saying that you would rather a car driver did not give you a warning beep to let you know of his approach?

Vanessa Washington

21/8/2019 17:39:22

Hi can anyone comment re the two abreast cycling. Is it deemed right for cyclists to ride 2 abreast through towns and highways chatting if they are holding up motorised traffic behind them? I live in the lake district which becomes very busy through summer and often find cyclists riding through the towns 2 abreast chatting to their fellow cyclist with little regard for the traffic building behind them. There are always corners and bridges in the towns and some remain 2 a breast over and around these. I worry for their safety. Clarification from other cyclists please!

A Dub

25/8/2019 00:39:00

Riding two abreast is legal, but one should not hold up other road users (same goes for horses!).

As to long lines of bikes riding close together: This is a peloton, it is usually a single line with one bike, after leading for a while, dropping back down the line for a rest (so two wide every few minutes). If the wind is from the side, then it may be two bikes wide.

Even organized events should, I assume, follow the law, but consider this for a moment.

The peloton offers protection from headwinds, saving energy, with members taking it in turn to take the brunt for the others. Now consider that they may be on a 50 or 60 mile ride, maybe longer, perhaps cruising at 30mph on the flat, climbing inclines of several 1000ft. Also consider that the peloton may contain not just enthusiasts, but possibly Olympic hopefuls too.

I'm not suggesting that this gives them any rights, but try to put yourself in their shoes. Imaging cycling as fast as you possibly can to the shops until your legs and lungs burn and being hassled by cars and breathing fumes, then multiply that effort and discomfort by 10, your effort won't come close. Now imagine you, driving behind them, waiting to pass; 150hp under your toe, A/C, radio, able to make up any loss they cause you in minutes. Take the long view and enjoy watching what the human body can achieve!

robert craven

25/8/2019 09:54:07

If cyclists want to train they don't have to do it on the road. There are plenty of establishments that will and can accomodate them and improve their abilities off road rather than on it. A motorcyclist and car driver who wants to improve their abilities to go faster goes onto a track. There are plenty of such tracks available and some private roads so why don't they use race tracks to improve their performance and leave the roads for general usage. Sounds very much to me that some cyclists go out for a blast just like some motorcyclists do or by boy racers in cars. Pushing the envelope to what... improve their times from point A to B. Pushing the envelope of not only their own abilities but putting themselves and other at risk on our roads at the same time. Creating a rolling road black which is in itself an offence in law if being a motorised vehicle. and using the highway as there play place. Road racing is road racing whether its registered as one with the authorities or not and time Time trials and road racing should be made illegal if it isn't already. With the freedom of the road comes responsibility and it sound to me that some cyclists are too selfish or ignorant and fail to understanding that that they cannot use the road as their fun and pleasure place without being responsible for their actions and the collective actions of others as a group. If groups of motorcyclist behaved in the same way with the same bad attitudes then they would be dealt with by the laws of the land. This is a new phenomena and Its about time the Law and the Highway Code were updated to take into account the various problems and possible offences appertaining to the rights and freedoms and offences of cyclists on our roads today.

7/12/2019 12:02:00

I would prefer to admire what the human body can achieve at the swimming pool. Or the Sports Field, or the tennis court. Anywhere (including cycle stadiums) in fact except the Public Highway where I wish persons wishing and needing to get FROM A TO B (as opposed from A to A) to experience the minimum hassle and delay.

Holly

22/8/2019 15:58:44

I was wondering if anyone could advise whether who has more right on a cycle path? A cyclist or a pedestrian?

Also, whether when a cyclist comes to a Tucan crossing you are no longer "classed" as on a cycle path and that pedestrians have more right of way than the cyclist.

25/8/2019 00:10:53

Interesting! As a car driver, cyclist, and pedestrian, I take cycling seriously - all of those activities actually.
Yes, I wear Lycra, yes I have and use a bell, even against other cyclist. A ping to say, coming up behind you! I have bright lights (and a camera), I can't fit reflectors to my pedals, but my clothing is reflective.
Do what I do when I see cyclists doing things that are going to annoy others, I tell them; I don't want tarring with the same brush! Everyone should, a polite word is often enough.
I see most cycle-paths as slow, confusing and a danger to pedestrians - often because pedestrians can't walk in a straight line, or know where to walk. Cycle lanes are often little better, with sudden 90 deg, changes of direction, sudden starts and stops, terrible road surfaces, pot-holes, drains and detritus, not to mention cars! Not a safe place to cycle!
If a website is going to spout the law, do it accurately!
If we want to stop people cycling on pavements (and we should - kids too) then stop directing bikes onto them!
Should the driving test have 25hrs of compulsory cycling included? It may change perspectives.
People who are unable to walk, cycle or drive without looking at their phones should be taken out of the pool. They are a menace to everyone, not to say sad. I have to say what I see, women are the worse offenders - even when in charge of tiny children - Shocking!
I saw a woman today maroon a small child (carrying a bag that was to heavy for it) on a traffic island in the middle of a busy road, because her phone was more important than her personal slave. She didn't even wait and help direct him out of danger.
I see parents teaching kids to press pelican crossing buttons without looking at, or giving any regard to the road - just selfish, me, me, me.
Very few people seem to know how to how to use a zebra crossing - drivers or pedestrians. A woman (on her phone) stepped out in front of me the other day, nearly taking me out. My "oi! look first" was followed by a torrent of foul-mouthed abuse as though I was in the wrong!
Car drivers should be encouraged to take out cyclists that run red lights! (joke). I always stop, I fail to see why others can't. Having said that, where there is no left turn, cycles should be able to go through on a cycle lane.
I'm always polite when on my bike. If a car slows for me (especially on a narrow hill for instance where I'm working hard), they get a big thumbs up. I often stop cars passing me on blind bends, or conversely, wave them on if I can see that the way is clear - it costs nothing!
It's much harder for a cyclist to stop or change direction than it is for a car, so car drivers, use your noggin and give time and space to all those athletes out there, you may get thanked in return. That weaving bike is probably trying to miss a pot-hole, give them space - the road is for everyone, and driving a car is not a right!

Mike R

15/10/2019 07:40:25

Well done. Your feedback makes good reading.

25/8/2019 14:31:59

A.DUB I believe that we are coming from the same side of this matter. I have ridden two wheeled vehicle since a kid over 65 years ago. I still drive a car and also for the last 55 years a motorcycle or scooter so I have experienced most of the stupid and dangerous things that others, including pedestrians do except I don't drive or ride my vehicles on the pavements and yes there are idiots that we all suffer from but that's life an it has its trials and tribulations.

There are many things now wrong with our road safety not least as said is the need for new legislation to deal with this new problem and not a lot is being done about it. On our roads one of the greatest and most common dangers is that of Tailgating where drivers drive far too close to the vehicle in front. the H.C. recommend a safe following on or stopping distance. However on the other hand we have the DVSA and some driving Instructors advising learner drivers to forget all about this safe distance and follow other vehicles at no less than the thinking distances. Distances are important in order to maintain safety for ourselves from other road users and that includes cyclists.This brings me to a point of contention, one that as you say and we see cyclists forming a peloton for as you say the sake of training and improving performance. However by doing so they totally disregard any potential problem that can occur due to their extremely close proximity to each other. [ It's not a specific offence covered in the H.C.or by law as such] but is extremely dangerous to do it on a road . After all a car driver is nowadays expected to give some one and a half metres of distance whilst overtaking and can be prosecuted if found otherwise but conversely a peloton of riders can be a mere foot apart or less at as you say 30 mph or more. Now that to me seems irrational and illogical in law and to me and something perhaps the legislators should consider regards to all our safety on a road. ie if one cyclists goes down so close to others then per say it's understandable that several may be affected in the same way and will suffer. In those circumstances of the mayhem caused by that practice or procedure someone may get run over and killed or at least seriously injured. Is that a scenario that we want.... I think not.

25/8/2019 17:06:48

Hi Bob,

I think that you will find that tailgating is now illegal.
IMO thinking distance is far more important in a modern car. Just drive your foot into the floor - no more cadence braking! But then I watch the car three cars in front, so a rarely use my brakes!

I suppose that one weighs pain and gain in sports. Remember that a car has massive inertia and maybe traveling at 70+ weighing in at 1000Kg or so. My bike weighs about 8Kg I don't think that I have ever topped 45mph

Lets get the government to build multiple, long distance, exciting road-race only tracks ;) Just being facetious.
But seriously we have to share the roads. Actually, after the horse the bicycle was the first (verified) on the road if we discount the almost extinct steam car.
steam car 1769, first bicycle 1817 possibly 1500s!, kite power 1826, first electric car 1832, first petrol 1886...
And... did you know that you can legally take a sail powered bicycle on the road?

I wasn't condoning any activity, but explaining why this happens and offering a different perspective to those who have no concept. Travel a mile in a mans shoes (pedals) before you judge him is where I was coming from.

Riding in close proximity is like all things a skill and requires (IMO) a great deal of concentration and trust in people around you. It should also be noted that riders appear to cycle blind whereas signals pass from front to back constantly regarding hazards (potholes etc.).
I can't accept that this is in any way like tailgating. This is done in full concentration without music, phones, kids fighting in the back or rubber-necking. It is nothing like tailgating, which is often done by people too stupid to understand what they are doing or else trying to intimidate the person in front to go faster or get out of the way.

Actually, I find riding solo at any speed requires great concentration too due to the state of the roads alone.
The first priority should be roads that are safe for all users. They are shocking!

25/8/2019 20:48:15

Thanks for A.DUB that but I am fully aware that Tailgating is an offence but not as a stand alone offence of tailgating. Just recently its been identifiably rightly placed under the umbrella of driving without reasonable consideration for other road users, even as far as without due care and attention and sometimes of reckless driving.

As far as history goes it doesn't really matter who was first or when cycling became popular but here are two other facts. In 1934 some 1536 cyclists were killed on our roads in the UK in that year alone. Fewer were killed a year or two later when a 30 mph limit was imposed in towns with street lighting. Fact 2. Up to the second world war ie late 1930s some 70% of road usage was in fact by two wheeled vehicles both bicycles and motorised bicycles.

No matter what you say or what extraneous facts you have put forward you must admit that there are dangers associated with the increased use of bicycles on our modern yet old road traffic system. A road system which since the 1970's has concentrated on cars as they developed to become the major users and creators of the greatest danger. Therefore with fewer bikes little was designed to accommodate cycling and its been in decline since the 1960/70s to the extent where cyclists were about as rare as rocking horse droppings.

We can go to and fro with our arguments facts or otherwise but whilst I, like yourself consider myself to be a safe driver and more so a safer motorcyclist I still have to admit, just like you do that here are idiots out there on our roads in cars, on motorcycles and on bicycles and no matter how much you and I treat the roads dangers with the greatest respect there are those that don.t They are the ones that create a lot of our present problems.

Hopefully with the new electronics coming that take away many of the problems that we currently suffer from there may be a future where conflict and collisions reduce, hopefully dramatically and road sharing will become the norm and civilised. Unfortunately I don't hold out that much will change in the near future but maybe in 20 years time or until its proven to work.

I doubt that I will be around to see that day. Enjoy the road and be safe.

26/8/2019 12:28:53

I was saying that we need to share the road, I was making no claim about "rights", just pointing out as an interesting fact the time-line in which different users 'joined' the roads - I admit that I didn't explicitly say that either, my bad. Take from the data what you will.
And as you are fully aware, there are lies, damned lies and statistics! For instance... I was recently watching a GCN article regarding Dutch research that suggests that you would be better off wearing a helmet when walking and not when cycling. This is from a nation of cyclists! I'll stick to using a helmet when I cycle.
Going back to your fatalities value, just as a matter of interest, my understanding is that there has been a constant fall in cyclist fatalities since the 30's so how do you equate the fall with street-lighting (I'd be interested to read the report)? I would suggest here are far more variables than one! Some might be... a shift to public and private transport about that time, (dare I say) better roads, a difference in length and frequency of journeys, education, quality of manufacture, improved bicycle technology, improved ambulance response, improved surgery and medical care, improved communication (of accidents), weather forecasts? quality of protective clothing, education, mobile phones, bike lanes, peoples expectation that they have rights, etc! will all have an effect.

As an adjunct, I wonder how many people have been injured/killed on bikes as a result of being lost? In the list above I note "improved bicycle technology". This is probably significant. One had reflectors, lights that made things darker when you turned them on, and a bell! (I used to manufacture a rear light battery back-up for dynamo sets - the "stay bright")
Today my bike has it's own data network, it records everything, has GPS, can tell me where to go, where I've been, measures speed, inclines, heart-rate, cadence, controls my lights, camera, It will inform someone when and where (if) I fall off and allow people to follow my ride in real time, and if I had shallow pockets, it could even directly measure my power output! Astonishing!
And funny how things change, When I was a kid, I'd be stopped by the police during the day and told to turn off my motorcycle lights - now it's mandatory to have them on! Always a leader! ;)

26/8/2019 16:52:04

My comments were about the number of cyclists killed on our roads in 1934. Prior to that circumstance the speed of 20 mph limit had been instituted in towns and cities where there was street lighting fitted. So in every town and city and village that had such lighting all that was needed was a sign at the borders and repeater signs so far apart. However that was in the 1920st and there was a public outcry and that speed limit was abolished for a while. Its then that mayhem reigned in towns and cities and villages where motorised vehicles could be driven through them at any speed they wanted as there were now no speed limits. As a result of these and many more deaths and serious collisions it was felt necessary to introduce a speed limit and in the later 1930's one was to be the 30 mph that we have today. So that speed limit has served us well for nearly a full century. Not only was there the imposition of a 30 mph speed limit but crossing places were introduced on the roads to allow free passage of pedestrians to cross with some degree of safety. They were named after the politician who was instrumental in their introduction.

Many things have changes since those days, a second world war. followed by new technology in the ensuing peacetime which created the growth of the motor vehicle as a modern form of transport, better roads and railways etc but also as I have mentioned a progressive reduction of the numbers of cyclists on the road. Now cars and motorised cycles were the form of transport that people became use to . Social changes meant that one no longer worked and lived in the same streets and towns that their parents did and many moved for the sake of getting better jobs elsewhere in the country and so with greater distances to and from work and to and from relatives our road network grew and cars took the main place in that form of communications leaving others far behind. So the cycle lost out.

PS. there is legislation from the EEC that requires all the manufacturers of motor vehicles to fit day driving lights and have them automatically on during day light hours but unfortunately for the front only. All other older vehicles not fitted with day driving lights do not commit any offence if they don't have their other lights on as of a norm. Its discretionary, some do and some don't. Driving older vehicles without day lights is not an offence as yet.

Kane Brennan

29/8/2019 14:28:05

Toucan crossings. These are light-controlled crossings which allow cyclists and pedestrians to share crossing space and cross at the same time. They are push-button operated. Pedestrians and cyclists will see the green signal together. Cyclists are permitted to ride across.

Rule 80 on Gov site, which means if it is red for cars and green for pedestrians, I can legally cycle across it anyway I choose, loop holes ;)

Toucans are the ones that don't control the flow of traffic if you didn't know ;)

Julian

2/9/2019 23:17:16

Why are bike sellers and hirers not made to supply bikes that comply with UK Highway Code and law?

Why not supply regulations on the bike hire websites and locations in other languages?

In London there are supposedly 60+% of foreign born as well as millions of visitors who can just leap on bikes expecting to ride (or learn to ride) according to their own countries' laws.

If our UK born and educated cyclists don't know that a bike inside a red circle means no cycling or that the words "Cyclists dismount" on a blue background means "you must get off your bike", training or some other form of campaign is needed.

How can the Mayor of London spend so much money creating cycling superhighways for a special few lycra louts, and not consider educating them? Many ignore or are ignorant of the laws.

It would also make shared paths safer if the signage were improved and there was a stated speed limit. If you want to cycle at 15+mph, use the road. A man recently refused to cycle on the cycle path (not on the road but a 2-lane hard separated space on the erstwhile wide pavement) because others were cycling too fast. He and his wife were cycling on the narrow pavement.

3/9/2019 08:30:16

@Julian from the HWC "Blue rectangles are used for information signs except on motorways where blue is used for direction signs" Cyclists dismount is a sensible suggestion. We don't see signs telling car drivers to stop and get out! :)

@generally
I can't speak for London any more, but education in all things. As a car driver, I'd stop most others driving, the general quality of driving is abysmal. I'd start with taxis and "schools of motoring" They should be setting examples!

As a "Lycra wearer", I cycle for my health, and for that I work hard on my bike, always trying to push my limits. That doesn't stop me following the HWC. For my use, I personally see cycle paths as dangerous and inconvenient. They are often just unsuitable political offerings.

As to Lycra... I see "Lycra louts" as "professional" dedicated cyclists who spend a great deal of money on their chosen recreation/sport. I don't see them (I'm speaking as a car driver and pedestrian) as a hazard, they are applied and concentrated. I can trust their behavior. However kids and adults meandering (often on the phone and/or wearing earphones) are more often a menace on the road, pavements and cycle routes.

Putting people in a "safe environment" tends to make them reckless. Lets get cyclists back on the roads and educate everyone! We probably need to tweak a few things, but that shouldn't penalize any road user.

Ratmn link

8/10/2019 08:24:54

This morning I was walking my daughter to the local station. Yet again we had to seek cover from another cyclist coming at us while riding on the pavement. My daughter sought sanctuary behind me. I said (Calmly and politely) to the cyclist "Excuse me but it is not right that you are cycling on the pavement". He shouted "Yes I can read the Highway Code"
So I have and note that Section 69 clearly states :
Traffic signs and traffic light signals apply to all road users. Cyclists must obey them.
Section 71 clearly states
A red traffic light applies to all road users. Cyclists must not cross the stop line if the traffic lights are red. Use the separate stop line for cyclists when practical.
Rule 64 clearly states:
You must NOT cycle on a pavement.
The highways Act 1835 Section 72 Clearly states.
"If any person wilfully rides upon any footpath or causeway by the side of any road made or set apart for the use or accommodation of foot passengers, every person so offending in any of the aforementioned shall for each and every such offence forfeit and pay a statutory fine.
Why am I paying so much of my taxes and rates to accommodate cyclists who blatantly refuse to adhere to simple rules and regulations that separate motorists cyclists and pedestrians?
Selfish disregard for anyone else but themselves is a very common thread with cyclists.This is leading to heightened aggressive conflict, and I must say from what I have seen, the vast majority stems from the cyclist themselves.

Kakhome

16/10/2019 15:49:08

I have been screamed at by a car driver as I was turning right one morning. He mounted the pavement to come alongside me to hurl abuse through his window before wheel spinning away, I still can’t figure out what he was so irate about as witnesses said I’d turned correctly and it seemed to come out of the blue. The next day, at the same place I decided to use the pavement for the last 30 feet of my journey (which I do realise is incorrect but having been stung once, didn’t want a repeat of the previous day) and very cautiously went past a lady on her phone, using the grass verge to go past her, which caused her to swear profusely at me too!!!! Rather ashamedly I reacted very badly to her verbal abuse and shouted back, not something I’m proud of but in light of the previous day I’d had enough! I can’t seem to fathom where everyone gets this innate anger for each other? I was wrong. I shouldn’t have been on the pavement and I shouldn’t have shouted back, but, I will make a conscious effort not to do that again. Other people learn nothing from mistakes and simply lay the blame when perhaps we should all just be a little bit more tolerant. We can all be selfish, thoughtless, we all make mistakes and we are all in a hurry! Can’t we just try and remember we are all only human. There’s not much space per person any more so it’s only going to get worse. Take a breath, remember that most of it isn’t personal, even when we react as if it is (like me today!) and practice a bit of tolerance for each other and our imperfections.

7/12/2019 12:35:01

I'm sorry you were screamed at for turning right. Had you clearly signalled?
Why did you elect not to dismount and walk when you decided to travel using the footpath/pavement? Especially as there was a person already using that pavement (although the law makes no distinction in this respect). Had you observed that she was using a 'phone? Did you RING YOUR BELL to warn her of your approach?
You are not the first, and I think it is becoming essential for this country to understand why, as this breaking of the law is becoming so common. Socrates would surely be turning in his grave.

Andrew Derbyshire

8/12/2019 18:00:41

There is a different between SHOULD and MUST statements.

9/12/2019 00:04:20

For some reason, I've been asked if I want to 'unsubscribe from this post'. no-reply@editmysite.com seem to think I might want to as a result of Andrew Derbyshire's post above, which appears to have nothing to do with my post. If Andrew is referring to the words 'MUST' and SHOULD' when they appear in the Highway Code, then I am in complete accordance with his claim as that is my understanding too. So cyclists MUST NOT ride on pavements is a no-compromise edict conveying the fact that any cyclist who does ride on a pavement is committing a crime. Whereas the hypothetical statement "Cyclists SHOULD not ride on pavements" would have meant that there was some leeway (which there isn't as I understand things).

Rudyard link

31/1/2022 14:47:22

Unfortunately most cycle groups on the UK roads do not conform to the highway code, one rule for road tax paying motorists, and no rules for cyclists,
On busy roads you are required to be in single file this also applies to narrow lanes, racing of any sort is forbidden.
But how many time do we see cycling clubs on the highway riding at ridiculous and reckless speeds two and sometimes three abreast with no consideration for the safety of pedestrians or other road users,
When you politely explain the highway code you are met with abuse, I must add that not all cyclists are unsocial and rude, but get a group of lycra clad idiots going through a second puberty and it can get nadty.

Rudyard.

Stuart

18/4/2020 22:19:54

My mate recently hit a cyclist who was cycling in the middle of the road with earphones in, they were not seriously injured but im curious as to what this means for the cyclist as the incident was largely their fault, i know cycling with earphones however dangerous to ones own safety is not illegal but what will happen to the cyclist and what are the laws/rules for cycling in the middle of a main road?

19/4/2020 11:04:40

Cycling in the middle of the lane is called the primary position and is done for safety. If it had been a motor cyclist would you have said they were mostly at fault as well?

I personally wouldn't wear headphones for my own safety, I want to hear what the vehicles behind me are doing.

https://www.cyclinguk.org/article/road-positioning-cycling-explained

3/5/2020 17:29:21

Anyone who makes warning sounds from others unavailable to them must bear some responsibility for when some thing goes wrong and there was action that they could have taken to alleviate the consequences had they heard the cause, but did nothing because they did not hear it, because they had blocked off their hearing sensor channel.
A cyclist 'in the middle of the road' is in a (very) exposed position.If she wishes to survive, she should not block off her sound reception channels.
It should be against the law, just as it is for enclosed car drivers?

24/7/2020 10:12:54

Where is 'Justine's Comment' that according to you says 'Thanks that helped' ?

Josephine Gardiner

4/8/2020 10:04:43

Mine is a question. Car drivers and motorcyclists must have them, some mobility scooters have them and I have four placed strategically on my wheelchair so why don't push-cyclists require their bicycles to be fitted with wing mirrors as I had wing mirrors in the 1950s?

Julie McGlashan

9/8/2020 08:37:17

When it says ride on the right side on a cycle track, does that mean the right side or the correct side as indicated on signs? I was telling my daughter to keep left and someone coming the other way said we should be on the right?

9/8/2020 10:47:55

Dear Julie,
in reply to the recent emaiI I have received:
"So were we doing the correct thing by keeping to the left (in the UK)?" (which does not yet appear on this web site)
I HAVE NO IDEA. I wonder if anyone else has?
That is why I sent my posting to this site (yet to see it myself) and am researching The Official Highway Code to see if I can wake them up before I, reluctantly, take recourse to writing to my MP to ask him if he would kindly Take Action to get the wording of Section 62 CHANGED so that it is in future not liable to misinterpretation, which it obviously is (e.g. you vs. the person who clearly thought your daughter should be riding on the 'Right' (-hand side).

9/8/2020 10:21:25

PLEASE get Section 62 second paragraph:
"
If you are using a segregated path, it is important to make sure you stay on the right side of the track to avoid colliding with pedestrians. Be on high alert in case pedestrians pass into your lane without realising.

"
CHANGED so that this Very Serious Ambiguity is not allowed to perpetuate. Unless cyclists are ALWAYS required to ride 'On the Right'' then the wording clearly needs to be changed from 'right' to 'correct' to which the disturbing experience of Julie McGalashan and her daughter unfortunately bears witness.

9/8/2020 10:36:07

So were we doing the correct thing by keeping to the left (in the UK)?

9/8/2020 11:01:51

JULIE, I have now left the following 'Feedback' on 'Feedback' at
https://www.highwaycodeuk.co.uk:
Chris

"
PLEASE would you kindly ACT on the issue raised by the correspondence below (on 'Highway Code for Cyclists').
Thank you.
Christopher Johns
---------------------------------------------------------

JULIE MCGLASHAN
9/8/2020 08:37:17
When it says ride on the right side on a cycle track, does that mean the right side or the correct side as indicated on signs? I was telling my daughter to keep left and someone coming the other way said we should be on the right?

CHRISTOPHER JOHNS
9/8/2020 10:47:55
Dear Julie,
in reply to the recent emaiI I have received:
"So were we doing the correct thing by keeping to the left (in the UK)?" (which does not yet appear on this web site)
I HAVE NO IDEA. I wonder if anyone else has?
That is why I sent my posting to this site (yet to see it myself) and am researching The Official Highway Code to see if I can wake them up before I, reluctantly, take recourse to writing to my MP to ask him if he would kindly Take Action to get the wording of Section 62 CHANGED so that it is in future not liable to misinterpretation, which it obviously is (e.g. you vs. the person who clearly thought your daughter should be riding on the 'Right' (-hand side).
CHRISTOPHER JOHNS
9/8/2020 10:21:25
PLEASE get Section 62 second paragraph:
"
If you are using a segregated path, it is important to make sure you stay on the right side of the track to avoid colliding with pedestrians. Be on high alert in case pedestrians pass into your lane without realising."
CHANGED so that this Very Serious Ambiguity is not allowed to perpetuate. Unless cyclists are ALWAYS required to ride 'On the Right'' then the wording clearly needs to be changed from 'right' to 'correct' to which the disturbing experience of Julie McGalashan and her daughter unfortunately bears witness.

JULIE MCGLASHAN
9/8/2020 10:36:07
So were we doing the correct thing by keeping to the left (in the UK)?
"

9/8/2020 11:16:58

Julie, where was this? Were there really no signs on the 'floor' e.g. symbols [e.g. ARROWS] to indicate in which direction 'vehicles' in that part of the track should be travelling?

phillip

1/10/2020 15:45:20

I ride my bike to work but there are no cycle lanes at all from my house to work so I cycle on the pavement for my own safety and someone stopped me today and asked me why wasn't I cycling in the road and I just replied with but there are no cycle lanes at all for my own safety and I dont want to take on a 7 ton lorry at all

1/10/2020 15:57:34

So, Phillip, you consider your view of what is best for your safety to be above the law. Socrates would be weeping in his ROAD. When I started cycling a bicycle on the ROADS, at the age of 11, there were NO cycle lanes.
It appears you will have to walk if you wish to both conform to the law of my land and yet do not wish to cycle on the road.

Rebecca

20/10/2020 18:33:50

I think that there also needs to be rules out in regards to the placement of the lights and a limit on how bright they can be. I was on a foot/cycle/bridal path and all I could see was an extremely bright light hurtling towards me. I had to stop running and cover my eyes it was that bright, the worst part, I was not even able to identify the colours of the bikes or the clothe the cyclist with the bright lights was wearing and neither could I see that there were two cyclists on either side of him until his light had past (riding on the side a bit behind does is not single file). It was not even dark outside at that point. No respect, the path is not a road and elderly people, families with
children and disabled people go on the shared track as it is away from a pathless country roads. I don’t even know why there were road cyclists on there (get back on the roads!)
Same goes for car lights the brightness of them also need limiting.

Katie

23/10/2020 22:04:00

When the person in front dismounted their bike and another decides for an overtake. The front cyclist decides to mount and moved in front of the other cyclist. Who would be at fault?
To the right is an active road. Path was large enough for both cyclist. Due to the cyclist at the path deciding to change lanes at the last moment, the cyclist at the right is pushed to the road.

Tariq

1/12/2020 18:52:45

Why do cyclists never stop at red traffic lights? The highway code says they should stop. So this means they are breaking the law. However no cyclist gets stopped for this. I was nearly run over by a cyclist today whilst crossing when the green man was showing. One zoomed past then as I crossed the next one came flying by. Unbelievable!

1/12/2020 19:35:43

Tariq, neer is an overstatement. I did once see a woman stop at red traffic lights. Her male mate had gone through and was being beeped by the lorry that had stopped because they were red. I think there must be an oxygen rush that comes from cycling that disturbs the balance (especially the survival mechanisms) of the human brain.
Until someone completes high quality research into this, and appropriate action is taken as a result, I think we may have to continue to live with this antisocial, dangerous behaviour. Its a pity the Police do NOTHING about this. I have seen them do NOTHING. I think they are only interested in the bad behaviour of people in charge of powered vehicles.

24/1/2021 22:23:58

WHERE is spoonface's contribution:
"I ride and have ridden more miles than all of you and seen all tossers on cycles going through red lights & being knocked off doing so!! No I'm not a office worker Sunday black lycia wearing tosspot ither!! I cycle 110miles a week and totally ashamed to say most cycles are tosspots wearing BLACK No lights (day & night) cycling on pavements Going through Red lights double abreast in restricted areas!!! I've been doing this for 35 years day & night & seen it all!! Be ashamed of yourself and engage the brain bla bla bla. Yes I've camara footage of incompetent car & cycle but please make me proud of being a cyclists!!!"

I want to THANK HIM profusely, for it. I would like to be proud of cyclists, Come on, you can do it!

Cinema South Carolina link

13/3/2021 21:20:23

Thanks for sharinng this

robert link

8/5/2021 18:11:34

Great Post! Thank you for sharing usefull information. We are also provider of <a href="https://www.highway1.co.nz/product-category/electronic-equipment/traffic/"> Variable Speed Limit Signs</a>. Visit our website for more info highway1.co.nz

11/3/2022 06:47:18

Your blogs are always interesting. Thank you for sharing helpful content with us.

Hardest Degrees UK

Math Gorllwyn

30/6/2021 11:05:14

Hello.
Who has priority where a dual use bicycle path and pedestrian pavement adjacent to a main road (and separated from the main road by a grass verge) crosses a private driveway - a bike/pedestrian or a car using the driveway?

John smith

5/8/2021 23:19:29

Around here cyclists ride 3 abreast on small country back roads and never allow cars to pass causing major tail backs, they also leave my car standing whilst in a 30 limit when I’m travelling at 30 via GPS, they use their phones and are generally very ignorant. The worst ones are the cycle clubs as seem to think that they can do what they like as know that the police only ever target motorists and never then or those people ( kids normally) riding on those illegal privately owned electric scooters/ bicycles. Cyclists should also have to have insurance as often collide with pedestrians whilst on shared paths as ride far too fast plus If they use the roads then they should contribute to the upkeep of them just as other users have too as they have paths and crossings etc built specially for them by the highways that vehicle owners have to pay for.

Kiera

21/8/2021 17:36:41

As a person who cycles and drives I think many road users need to have more respect for each other but I find more car users having issues with cyclists because they believe cyclists should do this and that with no information to back there claims because they are chatting nonsense,

As I cycle I get people shouting out the window at me to get off the road as they pass me rather dangerously

Well big man you are only licensed to use the road where as I have a right , when you lose your licence for driving like a tit , you still have a right to cycle on the road

You don’t pay road tax on that bike

Well big man I do I have a car sat at home that hasn’t been been driven for 2 months I still pay road tax on

Your probably not insured

Yes.. yes I am cos I like to make sure when you driving like a tit and knock me off my bike I can replace by bike after you have demolished it or if I where to scratch your car

Shaun Collorick

17/9/2021 14:13:52

I often see speed traps, cars stopped for random checks and other car related things, but rarely do I see police on patrol to catch cyclist jumping red lights, riding on paths, riding without lights, two or more abreast on major roads or riding no handed on mobile phones. You always see in the papers about tightening rules for car drivers and easing rules for cyclists to make cycling safer, how about enforcing the rules and laws that already exist.

8/3/2022 08:42:39

Get Higher National Certificate in Engineering assignment Help by HND Assignment Help at an Affordable Price. We have more than 7000+ Qualified Experts in the team to give you the best online education services.

Bluebird

24/12/2021 06:26:52

Organised road based "time trials" should be attended by masses of PCSOs arresting all participants riding with their head down not paying attention to their surroundings. That would soon get rid of them.

As a pedestrian I hate the rule about ringing the bell as you approach. Cyclists should be riding in such a way that a warning is not necessary. It gives the impression that the pedestrian is being ordered out of the way - which at least one commentator above seems to believe they should be. It makes no more sense than cars beeping their horns at every cyclist and just creates a noise nuisance. Every idiot looking at their phone or listening to headphones should be a reminder that they could have been a deaf person or one with disabilities unable to quickly react to cyclists.

1/2/2022 11:48:22

Dissertation Project

Order Now 7ET023 Dissertation Project for the University of Wolverhampton to www.hndassignmenthelp.com Because we provide timely assignments delivery with Quality at an affordable price. We have more than 7000+ Qualified and Experienced Experts in the team to give you the best online assignment help.

2/3/2022 06:19:25

Get Assignment Help for Adult Nursing by HND Assignment Help at an Affordable Price. We have more than 7000+ Qualified Experts in the team to give you the best online education services.

TAMANNA JAIN link

13/4/2022 09:08:34

Your blogs are always interesting. Thank you for sharing helpful content with us.

<a href="https://www.hndassignmenthelp.com/top-5-hardest-degrees-uk-in-2022-analyzed-by-hnd-assignment/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=top-5-hardest-degrees-uk-in-2022-analyzed-by-hnd-assignment">Top 5 Hardest Degrees UK In 2022 Analyzed By HND Assignment</a>

<a href="https://www.hndassignmenthelp.com/n2-lewis-structure/">N2 Lewis Structure, n2 lewis dot structure Assignment Help</a>

Top 5 Hardest Degrees UK In 2022 Analyzed By HND Assignment Help

N2 Lewis Structure, n2 lewis dot structure Assignment Help with HND Assignment Help

James

22/4/2022 21:09:02

I was stopped at temp lights on red this evening and a saw a cyclist come up behind me and onto the footpath still riding he was just about to go through red so I beeped at him he came back and said came back and asked why did I beep so I ask he was going through a red and he was on the footpath his reply was " mind your own f**king business" and carried on through. Why can't we do anything about it but they want to rule the road?

Jason Smith link

7/6/2022 07:46:15

All the sections are explained beautifully. Keep sharing such articles.

Eleanor

7/6/2022 08:52:04

Is it illegal for a cyclist to cycle against the traffic?

Highway code for cyclists

Leave a Reply.

Subscribe
for Highway Code news

Highway code for cyclists

Leave a Reply.

Subscribefor Highway Code news

Subscribe
for Highway Code news